Aug 16

Umpires Go After Dickey

The issue isn’t R.A. Dickey’s bracelet, but the umpires chose to make it one. Umpiring is as bad as ever these days, and last night’s decision indicates how clueless these guys are.

It also underscores the primary complaint about umpires, and that is inconsistency. You see it every game with each umpires’ “interpretation” of the strikezone. It is flat out WRONG that each umpire has his own strikezone. The one in the rule book is official and that’s the one that should be used.

Back to Dickey.

First, if the Reds did not complain about Dickey, then the umpires acted on their own. Since when are umpires to unilaterally made decisions – without input from either team – that impact the outcome of a game?

For example, umpires aren’t supposed to alert a runner if he failed to touch the plate. Nor, is he allowed to alert the defensive team. Here, the umps acted on their own.

If Dickey’s bracelet was permissible all season, what’s the big deal now? If last night’s crew was correct in ordering the bracelet removed, that would mean every other crew was wrong for allowing it.

That is, if the rules stipulate no jewelry – or is it no distracting jewelry? Again, reportedly the complaint did not come from the Reds.

If there’s a rule stipulating no attachments to the uniform, then what’s with all the chains, earrings and bracelets you see all the time in an ML game/ Why isn’t that enforced? Please don’t say “because the umpires have so much to do.”

If Dickey’s bracelet is to go, then so should everybody’s bling.

An umpire’s job is actually a simple one: Follow the rule book. Fair or foul; ball or strike; out or safe? It’s either one or the other. If there’s no jewelry of any kind, enforce it equally.

Dickey’s bracelet is a gray area, If Dickey pitched with it all season, then why the issue now? Either last night’s crew or every one before in a Dickey start is wrong. Which is it?

Which is it? That’s the essence of today’s umpiring. Nobody seems to know.