Apr 03

Why The Rush On Murphy?

Sure, I want the Mets to play Daniel Murphy as much as anybody. I’ve long advocated keeping him while there have been voices to trade him. We all know he’s gone after this season, because there’s no way the Mets will extend his $8-million contract.

But putting him on the Opening Day roster now – they will decide Saturday – is pushing the envelope when they don’t have to.

They extended Juan Lagares and are considering doing the same for Lucas Duda, but Murphy isn’t in their long-term plans. However, they seem adamant about the short term, which is placing him on the Opening Day roster despite having played sparingly the past two weeks with a pulled right hamstring.

Because he played in minor league games this week, the Mets can backdate his time on the disabled so he would only miss the first six days of the season. Murphy took five at-bats in an intra-squad game Thursday, but did not play in the field. He could play in the field today, but there are no guarantees.

Hamstrings are tricky to begin with and the Mets initially described it as tightness, then subsequently a pull. Even so, GM Sandy Alderson later only called it a mild strain. Doesn’t he read the papers? Alderson told reporters there’s been “a significant upgrade in his status from a couple of days ago.”

Even so, Murphy hasn’t done any serious running, so what’s the allure of sending him out there in the cold weather of Washington? Remember, the Mets pushed back Matt Harvey until the third game of the season so he would start in the afternoon when it would supposedly be warmer.

In the big picture, what’s the purpose of the first six days? Why risk further injury that would keep him out longer, perhaps for several more weeks? Some risks aren’t worth taking, and this is one of them.