It is essentially the beginning of the free-agent market, but for the New York Mets it is already nearing last call.
Both of whom won’t be in it for the long haul for the Mets.
Arroyo has a track record of compiling innings, which is paramount, but is said to want three years. Eventually he will break down. If I am giving three years to a pitcher in this market, I would have rather gambled on Phil Hughes – who got those three years from the small market Twins – who is 27.
With Matt Harvey out until 2015 – and there are no assurances of what he’ll be when he returns – Hughes was potentially a better building block than Arroyo.
Initially, I liked the idea of Arroyo, and still do, but not for three years. Two years at the most. Arroyo made over $16 million last year in Cincinnati – another small market team – and won’t be taking a pay cut.
He was 14-12 last season pitching behind an offense and bullpen superior to that of the Mets. What can the Mets reasonably expect from him?
Meanwhile, Furcal made $7 million last year for not playing with St. Louis because of Tommy John surgery. After the season ended Alderson said he didn’t want an injury reclamation project, which clearly defines Furcal.
The best shortstop option for the Mets defensively, and for his offensive style in Citi Field, was Stephen Drew, who was out of their price range. However, he would have been a key piece to build around.
Jhonny Peralta was also too expensive and came with the black cloud of a PED suspension.
If the Mets sign Furcal, they will be looking to replace him next winter. If that is the case, I’d be more inclined to give Ruben Tejada another chance.
Arroyo and Furcal are the latest names linked to the Mets, and they are clearly filler for 2014. That’s what you want?
One by one the better names in the market will be scooped up, and not by the Mets.
More and more, I see this being a barren winter for the Mets. Then again, there was Chris Young.