The Mets wasted a sparkling performance by R.A. Dickey last night, but with their anemic hitting lately, that’s hardly a surprise.
PARNELL: Will it ever happen?
What I took out of last night’s loss was again a spotty, head-scratching performance from Bobby Parnell, who continually proves it isn’t how hard you throw it, but when and where.
Parnell tweaked the radar gun at 100 mph., but was all over place, needing 32 pitches to get out of the inning, but not before giving up a two-run single that effectively put the game out of reach.
Perhaps the circulation issue in his finger is resolved for now, but that doesn’t mean he’s void of questions and concerns.
One scout said it is the same old thing with Parnell.
“He doesn’t have the command or the ability to control a secondary pitch consistently,’’ said one scout, adding when Parnell muscles up with this four-seam fastball the pitch has a tendency to flatten out. It’s harder than his two-seamer, but without the movement required at this level to get hitters out.
I thought the Mets misused Parnell under Jerry Manuel – putting him in the rotation, then yanking him after a few bad starts at the end of a lost season – but now they seem to have slotted him into one role.
However, Parnell hasn’t adopted to that role, leaving the team with several options:
a) Leave him in the current eighth-inning role and allow him to take his lumps at this level.
b) Pitch him earlier in the game that keeps him exposed to major league hitters.
c) Send him to the minor leagues and assign him one role and allow him to perfect that.
Conventional thinking had Parnell taking over the closer role for Francisco Rodriguez after this season, but his inconsistency and ineffectiveness had shoved those plans to a back burner.