Matt Harvey pitched five innings in his third start, giving up five runs and eight hits in the process. If there is a positive, it is two scoreless innings after the Padres got the jump on him.
HARVEY: Building on a rough day. (Getty)
All pitchers, and Harvey will not be an exception, get rocked and it is a measure of their development in how they respond. Six outs doesn’t complete the learning curve, but it is a start.
We can’t be thinking we’ve seen the best of Harvey already. Three games is no measure, but the overall impression is good. He’s shown good stuff physically, composure and a degree of mental toughness indicating a future promising good times.
I don’t care about today, and frankly was wondering when he’d get shelled, and most importantly, how he responds. In that regard today is a positive because it is something that can help Harvey mature and develop.
I’m anxious for his next start.
The Mets lost Friday night in a game they might have won had they had any offense – or anything left over from their last game in San Francisco. Unfortunately, we all know it doesn’t work that way.
DICKEY: Don't mess with him. (AP)
R.A. Dickey pitched well enough to win most games, and that’s the real point. Dickey has pitched well on traditional rest. Going to three days might be a huge mistake. Reportedly, the Mets aren’t sold on it and let’s hope it they don’t buy.
The only answer is more major league arms, of which the Mets don’t have. I’m not saying Derek Lowe is the answer, or any recently released starter. But, the closest thing the Mets have to an option if they are to remain competitive for the rest of the season is to keep Dickey on normal rest.
Yes, he’s a knuckleballer, but not in the conventional sense. Also, it isn’t just taxing the arm, but the entire body. Dickey has developed into one of the game’s most reliable pitchers, and part of his success in his routine.
Don’t mess with it.
Rudy responded the other day and suggested .500 was a pipe dream. Well, is it?
There have been times this season when I thought so. During spring training and after their last horrid home stand. Not a week ago I ripped Terry Collins for saying things would turn around. I saw no indication of it at the time, but this is a good trip.
I’m not going to jump on the bandwagon – cable car – just because the Mets had a fun time in San Francisco. Afterall, they’ve had good stretches before. But, all you have to do is go back to last year and St. Louis and Tampa to see teams get hot late.
I wouldn’t suggest playoffs, but .500 is not out of the question. There are several things outside of making the playoffs that would define this as a successful season, and .500 is one of them.
The Mets are 8.5 games behind in the wild card stretch, but after dismantling the Giants they are only two games under .500. You take these things in small steps and two games isn’t much to make up considering all the games remaining.
Five-hundred? It isn’t the ultimate goal of this team, but it is possible and represents significant progress.
Yes, there are holes in their game, notably the pen. But, Bobby Parnell had a strong outing in the SF series and the pen hasn’t done badly on this trip. Let’s see if they can maintain. It’s not a pennant race, but it is a small step and that’s what rebuilding teams are about.
Mets manager Terry Collins confirmed on his weekly radio show he’s contemplating using R.A. Dickey on short rest, which would enable Johan Santana and Chris Young to get more rest.
Sounds plausible, but we don’t know what toll, if any, this would have on Dickey. He does throw a knuckleball, but but it isn’t a conventional knuckler.
Another thing the Mets are throwing against the wall to see if it will stick is limiting Jon Niese’s innings similar to what Washington is thinking about with Stephen Strasburg. Niese ended recent seasons on the mend so it isn’t a bad idea, especially if the Mets are out of it.