<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jan. 2.10: Your Mets batting order.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/</link>
	<description>Featuring Mets&#039; commentary, analysis and news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve The Original</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36364</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve The Original</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36364</guid>
		<description>Sounds just about right to me. I&#039;m still hoping that they sign a platoon bat for 1b.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds just about right to me. I&#8217;m still hoping that they sign a platoon bat for 1b.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesSC</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36349</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesSC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36349</guid>
		<description>#13, Just as I think it is highly unlikely that all of our ??? come out positively next season (which is what the current rotation would need), I find it equally unlikely that the big 3 question marks will all come out negatively next year.  One of them will be an excellent secondary pitcher to go with Santana next year, one will likely wash out and one will be all over the place and/or injured.  Which is why I think we can live with a solid #3 acquisition and not overspend to get another &quot;the&quot; guy for #2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13, Just as I think it is highly unlikely that all of our ??? come out positively next season (which is what the current rotation would need), I find it equally unlikely that the big 3 question marks will all come out negatively next year.  One of them will be an excellent secondary pitcher to go with Santana next year, one will likely wash out and one will be all over the place and/or injured.  Which is why I think we can live with a solid #3 acquisition and not overspend to get another &#8220;the&#8221; guy for #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36338</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36338</guid>
		<description>Great to see you are getting linked!

There is a link on the trackback link that talks about the mob links to companies that were part of building taxpayer field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see you are getting linked!</p>
<p>There is a link on the trackback link that talks about the mob links to companies that were part of building taxpayer field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links: Mafia And The Mets, Jason Bay And More &#124; The Mets Report</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36336</link>
		<dc:creator>Links: Mafia And The Mets, Jason Bay And More &#124; The Mets Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36336</guid>
		<description>[...] John Delcos’ New York Mets Report- Predicting the 2010 Opening Day starting lineup and batting order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Delcos’ New York Mets Report- Predicting the 2010 Opening Day starting lineup and batting order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill metsiac</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36333</link>
		<dc:creator>bill metsiac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36333</guid>
		<description>I like John&#039;s original line-up, but I wonder why Molina&#039;s addition would change things. I&#039;d bat him 7th or 8th, just like the other Cs, preferably 7th. I like a #8 with a higher OBP to clear the P when he bats with 2 out, and one who is less likely to be thrown out at 2B if he&#039;s on 1st and the P bunts.

As for the top of the order, I could see Luis leading off even with Reyes healthy. He wouldn&#039;t steal as many bases as Jose, but wouldn&#039;t clog the bases if Jose gets a 2B or 3B. Luis has the higher OBP, Jose the extra-base ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like John&#8217;s original line-up, but I wonder why Molina&#8217;s addition would change things. I&#8217;d bat him 7th or 8th, just like the other Cs, preferably 7th. I like a #8 with a higher OBP to clear the P when he bats with 2 out, and one who is less likely to be thrown out at 2B if he&#8217;s on 1st and the P bunts.</p>
<p>As for the top of the order, I could see Luis leading off even with Reyes healthy. He wouldn&#8217;t steal as many bases as Jose, but wouldn&#8217;t clog the bases if Jose gets a 2B or 3B. Luis has the higher OBP, Jose the extra-base ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36331</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36331</guid>
		<description>john/tiffany

perhaps castillo is the best option to put at 1. i dont like moving david or carlos to 2. that weakens the lineup.

perhaps cora goes at 2, but he is a poor hitter and murphy cant bunt so you dont want him there.


i think john is right, we need to get another pitcher. even if the pitcher is only good to run out every 5th day and do 6/7 innings. pelfrey/maine/ollie needs to prove they can pitch. 

if everyone is healthy this will be a much improved team. but make no mistake, our problems the past 5 years has always been the rotation. even 06 was a problem. ollie came over and had a few good months. they patched up the back end with a steady stream of rejects that the hitters covered for.

this thread reminded me we still have the idiot coaches from last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john/tiffany</p>
<p>perhaps castillo is the best option to put at 1. i dont like moving david or carlos to 2. that weakens the lineup.</p>
<p>perhaps cora goes at 2, but he is a poor hitter and murphy cant bunt so you dont want him there.</p>
<p>i think john is right, we need to get another pitcher. even if the pitcher is only good to run out every 5th day and do 6/7 innings. pelfrey/maine/ollie needs to prove they can pitch. </p>
<p>if everyone is healthy this will be a much improved team. but make no mistake, our problems the past 5 years has always been the rotation. even 06 was a problem. ollie came over and had a few good months. they patched up the back end with a steady stream of rejects that the hitters covered for.</p>
<p>this thread reminded me we still have the idiot coaches from last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim bmore</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36329</link>
		<dc:creator>jim bmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36329</guid>
		<description>funny how warthen was getting the credit for perez consistency two yrs ago and the blame now...i think ollie is just immature and brain dead most of the time...hope that changes this yr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny how warthen was getting the credit for perez consistency two yrs ago and the blame now&#8230;i think ollie is just immature and brain dead most of the time&#8230;hope that changes this yr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36327</guid>
		<description>(13) I think both rotations have question marks, yet Delcos seems to disparage only the Mets.

As for Warthen, you&#039;ll get no argument from me.  He is perhaps a huge contributor to the inconsistent performances of Perez, Maine and Pelfrey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(13) I think both rotations have question marks, yet Delcos seems to disparage only the Mets.</p>
<p>As for Warthen, you&#8217;ll get no argument from me.  He is perhaps a huge contributor to the inconsistent performances of Perez, Maine and Pelfrey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Chiti</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36325</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Chiti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36325</guid>
		<description>12.  Interesting point of view.   Met pitchers have had a solid season so the ability is there, but the Philliy pitchers have above average seasons when they pitch well.  It is of course impossible that the Met pitchers pitched above average, and it is of course impossible that Philly pitchers have ability.  Especially their rookie who had a season that Maine/Perez/Pelfrey can only dream about. 
Met pitchers have ability?  Maine is living on one great month in 2007 , Pelfrey on half a great season and Perez two good years surrounded by hideous ones.  And with a pitching coach who watched as staff walked too many batters but decided it was ok to blame his ex-catchers, who was advertised as a great catcher working with the pitcherd when brought./  Yes, there are 24 good reasons to have faith in these Met pitchers....  Its called a case of Magic Hat Winter Sampler.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12.  Interesting point of view.   Met pitchers have had a solid season so the ability is there, but the Philliy pitchers have above average seasons when they pitch well.  It is of course impossible that the Met pitchers pitched above average, and it is of course impossible that Philly pitchers have ability.  Especially their rookie who had a season that Maine/Perez/Pelfrey can only dream about.<br />
Met pitchers have ability?  Maine is living on one great month in 2007 , Pelfrey on half a great season and Perez two good years surrounded by hideous ones.  And with a pitching coach who watched as staff walked too many batters but decided it was ok to blame his ex-catchers, who was advertised as a great catcher working with the pitcherd when brought./  Yes, there are 24 good reasons to have faith in these Met pitchers&#8230;.  Its called a case of Magic Hat Winter Sampler&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/2010/01/02/your-mets-batting-order/#comment-36323</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newyorkmetsreport.com/?p=4576#comment-36323</guid>
		<description>(5) I disagree regarding the pitching.  Perez, Maine and Pelfrey have all put up solid seasons in the past; so, the ability is there, it&#039;s a matter of accessing it (and health is always a factor there).

Have you looked at the Phillies&#039; rotation the last three years?  Each year, they&#039;ve had one stud starter and one other guy who has an above-average season (e.g., Kendrick, Moyer, Happ).  Beyond that, the rest of their rotation has been nothing to write home about.  Yet, they&#039;ve won three straight division titles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(5) I disagree regarding the pitching.  Perez, Maine and Pelfrey have all put up solid seasons in the past; so, the ability is there, it&#8217;s a matter of accessing it (and health is always a factor there).</p>
<p>Have you looked at the Phillies&#8217; rotation the last three years?  Each year, they&#8217;ve had one stud starter and one other guy who has an above-average season (e.g., Kendrick, Moyer, Happ).  Beyond that, the rest of their rotation has been nothing to write home about.  Yet, they&#8217;ve won three straight division titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

